![]() According to researchers (Shepperd, Waters, Weinstein, Klein, 2015), there are two basic. ![]() Poor performance on Exam 2 was associated with behavioral disengagement and denial, whereas positive performance on Exam 1 was associated with self-encouragement and sustain coping. Optimism that flies in the face of hard logic and harsh reality is termed, unrealistic optimism. Coping behaviors were assessed before and after Exam 1 and Exam 2, and were markedly different, specifically after Exam 2. The data also did not support our hypothesis that level of optimism would predict a student’s exam grades. As a whole, the intervention was not fully supported by the data, as the changes in optimism were not large enough to be statistically reliable. The study took place across four time points. The purpose of the present study was to administer an intervention to students (N=67) to attempt to shift their perspective towards that of a cautious optimist, and to determine the effects of optimism on performance and coping. ![]() A cautious/realistic optimist is defined as someone that has a good grip on reality, and a cockeyed/unrealistic optimist as someone that engages in self-delusion (Wallston, 1994). However, research has found that there are two types of optimists: cautious/realistic and unrealistic/cockeyed. In fact, there are two types of optimistic thinking in people: Unrealistic optimism often leads people to believe in good things to happen without focusing on. Historically, optimism has been studied as a dichotomous variable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |